1. What is L-Directed and R-Directed
Thinking? Does my subject require
more of one than the other? How
could I try and reach a balance?
L-Directed Thinking is “sequential, literal, functional,
textual and analytic.” R-Directed Thinking is
“simultaneous, metaphorical, aesthetic, contextual, and synthetic.” As an elementary school teacher, I will
be responsible for teaching all subjects to my students. Subjects that require more L-Directed
Thinking are math; science; Reading in terms of the alphabetic principle,
decoding and literal comprehension; and Grammar. Subjects that require more R-Directed Thinking are Creative
Writing; History; Social Studies; and Reading in terms of inferential and
evaluative comprehension. In
subjects that are more L-Directed, I could try and reach a balance by
encouraging inferences, emphasizing multiple ways to come to a solution and
making predictions. Math,
proportion and symmetry can be found in nature, art and the faces that we see
on a daily basis, so aesthetic qualities could also be explored and appreciated. In subjects that are more
R-Directed, I could try and reach a balance by finding patterns in great works
of art and literature, modeling certain author’s writing style and identifying
the cause and effect of events.
2. How do
Abundance, Asia and Automation affect the dominance of L-Directed thinking in
business and schools?
Abundance, Asia and Automation affect the dominance of
L-Directed thinking in business and schools in that they diminish the value of
L-Directed thinking. Because of
Abundance, Asia, and Automation, L-Directed thinking is no longer enough. Our society is one of abundance. We are inundated with choices for
everything – what we eat, what we drink, what we wear, what we drive, what we
listen to, what we watch, etc.
Products need to be functional and reasonably priced, but because of the
abundance of choices available to us, they also need to be beautiful, pleasing
to all of our senses, and meaningful in order for them to stand out. “Asia” refers to the high numbers of
knowledge workers that are being trained and hired at a
significantly lower cost than their American counterparts. Whereas these knowledge workers used to
be trained and hired exclusively in the US, countries like India, Russia, and
the Philippines are now producing large numbers of these knowledge workers who
are willing to work for a fraction of the cost. Automation refers to the growing trend of technology taking
the place of human workers. In
most cases, machines, databases and software can do the job of their human counterparts
quicker, better and cheaper.
3. What is High
Concept and High Touch? What is
the impact of this on my teaching?
High Concept is the capacity to “detect patterns and
opportunities, to create artistic and emotional beauty, to craft a satisfying
narrative, and to combine seemingly unrelated ideas into something new.” In other words, High Concept includes
the ability to create beautiful, meaningful and original ideas.
High Touch involves “the ability to empathize with others,
to understand the subtleties of human interaction, to find joy in one’s self
and to elicit it in others, and to stretch beyond the quotidian in pursuit of
purpose and meaning.” In other
words, High Touch is the ability to positively interact with others, form and
foster healthy relationships, find joy in purposeful activities and service,
and encourage others to be their best selves.
Both High Concept and High Touch are abilities that have
been overlooked in the past, but are quickly gaining importance, relevance and
value in our changing society. This
impacts my teaching because I will need to ensure that I provide my students
with opportunities and experiences that foster development in creative
thinking, problem solving, innovation, and meaningful and purposeful relationships. I must also help my students discover
strategies that they could use to continuously improve their emotional and
mental health so that they could find joy within themselves and spread
positivity.
4. What are the
flaws of an education system that only value IQ? Is there also a role for EQ in education?
One flaw of an education system that only values IQ is that it
does not prepare students for a happy, social and meaningful life. Moreover, these education systems fail
to encourage students to think creatively, to form personal relationships, to
connect with others in different social settings, or to find purpose and
meaning in their work and studies.
There is absolutely a role for EQ in education – through community
outreach, service, and connections, students can learn the value of compassion,
empathy and care while discovering the positive effects it has on their own
lives.
The flaws you mentioned in the fourth question made me stop and think about whether or not I experienced an education like that. While I think a lot of administrators might appear guilty of focusing only on IQ, I do believe most teachers have always appreciated the emotional intelligence of their students. Without those teachers, I'm sure I would have turned into a L-Directed Thinking automaton.
ReplyDeleteI think you are going to do amazing things for your students!
I love that you will try to ensure to provide your students with opportunities and experiences that will foster creativity and character development. I know that you will do this. I think that it is important but something that is not touched upon nearly enough in schools. I believe that you will be an amazing teaching and don't doubt that you will incorporate EQ within your classroom!
ReplyDeleteI love this line, "I must also help my students discover strategies that they could use to continuously improve their emotional and mental health so that they could find joy within themselves and spread positivity." It's so important that we help our students to become positive people--not just in the optimistic sense but in the sense that they make a positive impact in the world and not a negative one.
ReplyDeleteBernice,
ReplyDeleteI really appreciate your specific ideas about how to incorporate R-directed thinking into historically L-directed subjects and vice versa. For example, how you suggested finding proportion and symmetry in nature to support mathematical learning. I think it is so important to think about how, as elementary educators, we will incorporate the entire spectrum of thinking, to allow for continuous growth opportunities for our students. In this way, we will also be able to capitalize on the strengths of our students across subjects. Thanks for providing this insight!